
Just a heads up that Blognut will be taking this coming week off as Mrs. B and I head to California in search of tacos, In-N-Out burgers and –of course – pantloads of Donuts. After all, with over 1800 Donut shops, greater L.A. is the undisputed Donut-capital of the world. But before we leave I have a bit of protesting to do.
Over the weekend we visited the Blognut-in-laws for some tasty Portuguese BBQ and to drop off our cat (he goes by Dominic). When we got there Mom-in-law handed me a pile of newspaper clippings she’d saved from the local daily. “Thought you might be interested in these,” she said. I read them over a glass of water and an oatmeal cookie and was outraged:
CARMEL - Homer Simpson wouldn’t want to grow old in Putnam County.
Doughnuts, his deep-fried favorite, have been deep-sixed at Putnam’s senior centers because officials say they are bad for the old folks’ health and could be dirty.
Not surprisingly, some of those same seniors don’t like the doughnut police telling them what to dunk in their coffee.
“I really don’t eat those things, but don’t think at my age I need to be told I can’t,” said Joe Hajkowski, 75, of Putnam Valley, who got 250 signatures on a petition protesting the doughnut ban. “I don’t like the way seniors are being treated by Putnam County.”
Hajkowski’s petitions included such sentiments as: “We want our donuts back. We are old enough to know whether we should eat them or not”; “Please replace donuts. We are not bad people” and “We are senior citizens. We are not senile citizens.”
The great doughnut debate began Aug. 2, when William Huestis, executive director of Putnam County’s Office for the Aging, sent a memo to the senior nutrition centers in Carmel, Mahopac, Putnam Valley and Cold Spring that the practice of accepting free, day-old pies, cakes, doughnuts and other baked goods had to stop.
Seriously, what gives?! These people can think for themselves and evaluate the potential health consequences of enjoying a Donut. Plus, when you’ve made it that far you should be able to eat whatever the hell you want. Now Heustis has valid - and I’m sure well-intentioned concerns. He states later in the article, “There are people (seniors) with chronic conditions who were eating three or four doughnuts a day and cakes and pies. We were concerned about wellness and diet.” And if someone’s a severe diabetic or has cardiovascular disease then sure, they should probably avoid sugary, trans-fat-laden Donuts. And maybe someone like my grandma - who has a severe self-control problem around sugar - should be monitored to see they don’t polish off a dozen at a time. But banning them altogether? Can’t center employees instead bring up their concerns to the seniors cramming the Donuts. Or approach the families and/or friends of the offenders?
Plus, psychological well-being is just as important as physical health right? So if the average, relatively healthy senior with intact mental faculties draws pleasure from eating the occasional Donut, who’s to say they can’t but them? As CG-72 points out, maybe it’s something to do with insurance liability. Maybe the senior center’s insurance plan states they must provide health-promoting food or something. Who knows. But until I see a viable, documented reason why these folks can’t have Donuts, I – alongside Joe Hajkowski, 75, of Putnam Valley - will continue to fight this asinine regulation.
If you agree that the seniors of Putnam should be able to enjoy their donuts, please join me in filling out this e-petition which I will present to Putnam County’s Office for the Aging. By “e-petition” I really just mean comment on this post with your name and a brief statement of support. Sorry for going all political on you, but I feel this has to be done.
See you in a week.
-Blognut